Collected Essays on the Nature of Viking Settlement

Dr J K Buckingham (kenbuckingham@yahoo.co.uk)

These essays radically rethink the origins of Scandinavian influence on England. Unquestionably Scandinavian people settled here. Their language is deeply embedded into English and their place names dominate much of the North and East. Unfortunately modern historians have jumped to the conclusion that, since the Vikings were Scandinavian, it must have been they who were responsible. In fact, Scandinavian influence is much older. It was already old when the seventh century historian, the Venerable Bede, included the Angles and the Jutes among the tribes who settled England after the Romans left. This collection of essays presents overwhelming evidence that this was the case.

The first essay ("1. Viking Related place names in England and Europe") presents the most powerful evidence against the Viking origins theory. It addresses the question that should have been asked by those who advocated it. Did the Vikings have an equally profound effect on their other colonies? The answer is a resounding "no". Nowhere else were entire regions like Lincolnshire and Yorkshire dominated by the same Scandinavian place names, typified by the place name ending "by". Neither in Normandy nor Ireland was this the case. Even in Iceland, where the country was completely taken over by Vikings, there are only a few. I also looked at Finland, but it is a somewhat different case. It was settled by the Swedes after the Viking period.

From a place name point of view, Lincolnshire and Yorkshire look more like an integrated extension of northern and insular Denmark than a separate country with scattered Scandinavian estates that one might expect from a country divided up as the spoils of war.

The second essay ("2. The Documentary Evidence for Settlement from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.") looks at the question of what the written history says about the nature of Viking settlement. The evidence for a mass migration and settlement is shown to be, at best weak. This does give the impression of a country divided up as the spoils of war; of an army, rampaging round England. They were victorious in much of the North, but were eventually repulsed in much of the South and West.

The third essay ("3. The Origin of Danish Settlement in England.html") looks at the question of what the written history describes how an elite fighting force waged war against some of the kingdoms of England (see section3, "Forms of Conquest"). It also introduces some of the other evidence for previous Scandinavian occupation.

Click on the topics below to open an Essay

1. "Viking Related Place Names in England and Europe."

This essay makes two important points. Firstly that no other Viking age colonies had substantial numbers of the place name endings which typify Scandinavian Settlement in England. This implies that these place names were not imported by Viking age settlers. Secondly that the number of such place names is overwhelming. It is not simply the establishment of a few villages, but, over substantial parts of England, their numbers indicate a continuum of Scandinavian place names across the North Sea. These numbers suggest a massive tribal migration not associated with the Viking Age Conquests.

2. "The Documentary Evidence for Settlement from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle."

The earliest and most important source of information about the Viking conquest of parts of England comes from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. It mainly records when the kings and bishops of England held office but goes into some detail about the struggle between Wessex and the invaders. It has been used as evidence for a mass Scandinavian settlement. This essay considers that evidence.

3. "The Origin of Danish Settlement in England."

This was my first attempt to understand why the consensus of opinion favours a Viking Age settlement of England, when there is so much evidence for Scandinavian settlement that pre-dates that period. It is rather a naive account, and makes some points that I would change with hindsight. However, there is also much that I would still stand by.

4. "Do Anglo-Saxon Place Names Cluster into Groups?"

We don't know how the various Germanic tribes divided up the England. They may have agreed upon nice tidy borders, or they may have formed a patchwork of tribal areas. I undertook this work to see whether place names could help clarify the situation. In England place name endings (or elements) often indicate the nature of a place, for example "ham" meaning a "home", "ing" meaning "the possessions of", or "beck" meaning a "stream". Where several of these place name endings commonly occur in close proximity, that group of place name endings might indicate a social grouping or tribe. Looking at groups of place names can be more powerful than looking at each place name ending individually.

5. "The Inferred Origins of Pre-Viking Anglo-Saxons."

A recent paper on ancient DNA by Gretzinger et al has helped clear up a debate between those who saw the Germanic settlement of England as a tribal migration and those who saw it as an elite takeover. The DNA evidence shows extensive Germanic settlement. The article goes on to examine the precise European origins of the settlers. My essay summarises and comments on this aspect of the Gretzinger paper.

6. "Myres and the Anglo-Saxon Settlement of England Re-Visited."

This essay considers the work of JNL Myres, who made a lifelong study of early Germanic pottery in England. This led him to believe that the Germanic settlement of England originated in the Roman auxilliaries who came here before the Roman withdrawal, and that these people were already "mixed" Anglo-Saxons before they arrived. In some repects his findings are similar to those of Gretzinger et al.

7. "The Viking Settlement of Northumbria"

It is widely believed that Viking power in England extended only as far north as the River Tees. There is no contemporary written support for this belief. The principle argument in favour seems to be the almost complete absence of Scandinaian place names in the area (particularly those ending in "by"). However, the same could be said of Viking colonies in Normandy, Ireland and Iceland. "By" place names were not commonly used by the Vikings of that period. If the absence of these place names north of the Tees is a poor test of the presence of Vikings in the area, we must look for other indicators. This essay examines the question further.

8. "Borderlands"

This note tries to reconstruct ancient Welsh, Cornish, and Scottish boundaries and examines their longevity.

9. "On Roman Foundations"

This note tries to reconstruct ancient Welsh, Cornish, and Scottish boundaries and examines their longevity.